|
|||||||
| Notices |
| EDI Documents EDI Documents Discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
At the beginning of current season one of my customers granted an 8% unconditional discount to some of their US retailers.
Before that, one of these retailer had 10 EOM 8%. So I removed the 8% from the ITD segment and added a SAC segment that discounts the invoice no matter what. By the way, this is exactly how the original, paper invoice from the vendor looks like. Recently I was called by the retailer's AP office. They say that the way the 810 look is wrong, that SAC segment may generate a double discount. Who's right? Below is the ITD segment... ITD*01*2***0**60
__________________
Alessandro Zipoli Director of I.T. @ Fashion Logistics Hasbrouck Heights, NJ |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Looks wrong? EDI data is for processing, not reading.
![]() I don't see how a double discount could be generated. Your ITD segment says NO discount. But who knows what kind of processing they do, post-translation. Perhaps their programs ALWAYS take the standard discount regardless of what the 810 says. In that case, your SAC segment will/might create an additional discount. You say their terms were 10 EOM, but your ITD segment says net 60 days. Maybe this is confusing them. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
> Looks wrong? EDI data is for processing, not reading.
Go tell it to an account payable office ![]() > You say their terms were 10 EOM, but your ITD segment says net 60 days They were 10 EOM 8% in the past. When they granted an unconditional 8%, they also changed to NET 60. TDS already shows the discounted amount (merchandise total less SAC allowance). They really shouldn't take an extra 8% if it isn't anywhere in the ITD. Thank you
__________________
Alessandro Zipoli Director of I.T. @ Fashion Logistics Hasbrouck Heights, NJ |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cash (terms) discounts are never put in a SAC segment, as it WILL upset the balance of th 810.
Cash (terms) discounts are reflected in the ITD and TDS segments. TRADE discounts go in SAC segments
__________________
Michael Mattias<br />Tal Systems, Inc. <br />Racine WI <br />http://www.talsystems.com |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: [EDI-L] SN1 segment as Mandatory | Giridhar Dittakavi | EDI-L News Group | 1 | 02-06-2009 01:35 AM |
| Re: [EDI-L] Re: SN1 segment as Mandatory | Michael Nolen | EDI-L News Group | 0 | 02-05-2009 11:54 AM |
| [EDI-L] Re:SN1 segment as Mandatory | Dunham Craig E. | EDI-L News Group | 1 | 02-05-2009 11:14 AM |
| Re: [EDI-L] SN1 segment as Mandatory | VANI RAMAKA | EDI-L News Group | 0 | 02-05-2009 05:46 AM |
| [EDI-L] SN1 segment as Mandatory | VANI RAMAKA | EDI-L News Group | 2 | 02-04-2009 11:07 AM |