Comments on: EDI, TPR and what it all means…. http://editalk.com/edi-news/2008/02/29/edi-tpr-and-what-it-all-means/ An EDI and Vendor Compliance Blog, Forum and Support Center. Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:11:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: ID? We don’t need no stinkin’ ID! | EDI Talk - Vendor Compliance and Electronic Data Interchange http://editalk.com/edi-news/2008/02/29/edi-tpr-and-what-it-all-means/#comment-30 ID? We don’t need no stinkin’ ID! | EDI Talk - Vendor Compliance and Electronic Data Interchange Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:43:03 +0000 http://editalk.com/articles/2008/02/29/edi-tpr-and-what-it-all-means/#comment-30 [...] the answer goes back to the concepts of “what is a trading partner relationship” - in that they need to work with their existing trading partners to find the best answer.  [...] [...] the answer goes back to the concepts of “what is a trading partner relationship” - in that they need to work with their existing trading partners to find the best answer.  [...]

]]> By: at EDI Talk - Vendor Compliance and Electronic Data Interchange http://editalk.com/edi-news/2008/02/29/edi-tpr-and-what-it-all-means/#comment-16 at EDI Talk - Vendor Compliance and Electronic Data Interchange Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:51:59 +0000 http://editalk.com/articles/2008/02/29/edi-tpr-and-what-it-all-means/#comment-16 [...] major headaches.  We’ve both made changes on each side of the EDI equation to help out the other partner to implement the data.   We’ve accepted alternatives to our own documents and changed what [...] [...] major headaches.  We’ve both made changes on each side of the EDI equation to help out the other partner to implement the data.   We’ve accepted alternatives to our own documents and changed what [...]

]]> By: John Burmeister http://editalk.com/edi-news/2008/02/29/edi-tpr-and-what-it-all-means/#comment-4 John Burmeister Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:34:28 +0000 http://editalk.com/articles/2008/02/29/edi-tpr-and-what-it-all-means/#comment-4 Well said, I couldn't agree with you more. - John Well said, I couldn’t agree with you more.

- John

]]>